News

In new Tunney Act comments filed today with the DoJ Antitrust Division, CWA assessed the Department’s proposed Final Judgment on the T-Mobile/Sprint merger and the announced divestiture deal with DISH.
The Federal Communications Commission today announced that Sprint fraudulently received tens of millions of dollars in federal subsidies by falsely claiming it provided Lifeline service to 885,000 inactive subscribers.
Deutsche Telekom’s twenty-member supervisory board is charged with supervising the management of DT, including its subsidiaries.
CWA DISTRICT 9 FILES NEW TESTIMONY TO CPUC SHOWING 3,342 CALIFORNIA JOBS AT RISK WITH PROPOSED MERGER. CONSUMERS WOULD FACE HIGHER PRICES, ESPECIALLY LOW-AND-MODERATE INCOME CALIFORNIANS.
The Communications Workers of America District 1 filed new comments with the New York Public Service Commission calling on the Commission to deny the joint petition of T-Mobile and Sprint to merge and supplementing earlier comments submitted by CWA District 1 in November 2018.
A new report finds that reducing the number of wireless carriers from four to three would lessen competition and reduce retail wireless workers’ wages.
A diverse array of concerned companies, consumer organizations, labor unions, and industry associations today announced the formation of the 4Competition Coalition, a new alliance to tell policymakers that the Sprint/T-Mobile merger as currently proposed must be blocked.
A new article provides more disturbing reminders how the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger could result in the closure of thousands of retail stores and the elimination of 30,000 jobs nationwide.
The Communications Workers of America (CWA) filed comments to the FCC analyzing the November econometric study submitted by Cornerstone Research on behalf of T-Mobile and Sprint's proposed merger.
The Communications Workers of America's November 28th presentation to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) about the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger refutes the companies' justifications for the merger and details the overwhelming evidence demonstrating that the merger should be rejected as currently constructed.